Cat Saves Boy; Huffington Post Proves Liberal Idiocracy Judgmentalism

May 21, 2014

cat saves boy from dogIn a post/article in the Huffington Post Newsrag, the story of how a cat saves a little boy from an overly aggressive dog was run.

HOWEVER this is not the reason for this blog post here, rather it is the complete Idiocracy and Judgmentalism on display by so many typical Huffington post commenters whereby they condemned the father for shooting the video while watching the dog attack his child as well as condemning the mother for what they thought was her leaving the child behind when in fact neither is true.

Any simple minded person can see that these were surveillance videos spliced together, otherwise how could the dad be at two places at once???
As well the mom was simply making sure the dog had left (as did the cat), NOT running away leaving her child.

YET, several members of Huffington Post could not figure this out!
I checked several HP members other comment history and found that those who had made these ridiculous accusations had a history of vile comments against Christians, Republicans, along with drinking the Global Warming Kool Aid and many other liberal issues.

Here is the video:

Here is the thread:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/14/cat-saves-boy-dog_n_5323973.html

Here is the member ID of one example and their comment:
Member; scaroth172

View Comments: Sort:
next
1 – 25
Commented May 14, 2014 at 15:24:24
“Why didn’t the father put down the camera and save the child. Ridiculous. I feel very sorry for this child.”

Here are comments from others who at least had the intelligence to view the video and actually see what happened instead of scaroth172 who essentially viewed a circle but called it a square.
Who we should feel sorry for is her and all of us who have to deal with the results of her voting

Permalink
Steve Rockett on May 17, 2014 at 12:27:45
“No one is this stupid. It was a video surveillance camera.”

Permalink
jwsbmwm3 on May 15, 2014 at 23:10:40
“You are pretty stupid”

Permalink
lenacat on May 15, 2014 at 21:14:58
“Again, pay attention. This was a security video. It was not a person using a camera. Learn to listen/read. You’ll find it quite helpful.”

Permalink
mcblogger on May 15, 2014 at 18:45:29
“There was no father behind the camera. This was taken with a home security system, i.e. cameras that run automatically all the time.”

Permalink
suzy the sewer on May 15, 2014 at 18:32:04
“It was security camera. Dad wasn’t there.”

Permalink
the transporter on May 15, 2014 at 17:46:51
“Most people today have home surveillance system around their home .”

Permalink
Ditchmonkey on May 15, 2014 at 17:01:16
“lol come on now…..”

Permalink
Firstnten on May 15, 2014 at 13:58:09
“It was a security camera mounted on the home. The father wasn’t there. No one was looking through the camera during the attack. The mother ran out when she heard her son scream.”

Permalink
Watching rock grow on May 15, 2014 at 13:40:11
“Dad couldn’t put the camera down because it and him were nailed to the roof!”

Permalink
ivlichelle on May 15, 2014 at 11:11:18
“I feel very sorry for you. It must be hard to go through life with such a low IQ.”

Permalink
Wuud52 on May 15, 2014 at 10:27:17
“Yes, these are stuck in place security cameras. Does not mean it is not staged, but the cameras are fixed like normal security cameras.”

Permalink
John Carne on May 15, 2014 at 09:04:48
“Wouldn’t it be nice if people READ the article and then commented? We can only dream of that utopia.”

Permalink
pbr56 on May 15, 2014 at 08:57:29
“How was the father holding multiple cameras. This was spliced together from at least 2 locations.”
Share it
Permalink
mikehawk5161 on May 15, 2014 at 08:47:26
“Please tell me you wont procreate.”

Permalink
IcedTee63 on May 15, 2014 at 04:17:41
“Sandy you really think a Father watched his child get mauled by a dog? It’s a Security Camera! Jeez People!”

Permalink
bmorganRN on May 15, 2014 at 02:36:07
“And I feel sorry for people with no brains.”

Permalink
eapelu on May 15, 2014 at 00:42:17
“It’s obviously a security surveillance camera shot from different angles.”

Permalink
fleursuzie on May 14, 2014 at 22:40:49
“um….did you think out your comment before you posted it?
The father is NOT filming the child, that is a security camera (actually several).
You see, security cameras are mounted to the house and are constantly recording (ie, he didn’t have to “turn it on”, it is automatic), so you see…no one is actually holding a camera while the child is being attacked.”

Permalink
TySegurado on May 14, 2014 at 19:41:33
“Because he was not holding a camera darling. There was 2 cameras as u can see when the point of view changes! That’s called CCTV System! U go to Walmart, ask for them, buy it, install in your house and suddenly as if by magic u can see what’s going on outside!”

Permalink
Misty DeRousseau on May 14, 2014 at 19:00:12
“There was no one behind a camera, it was caught on surveillance cameras and he spliced them together to show the whole incident and how it went down,”

Permalink
petrified on May 14, 2014 at 18:56:19
“Because the father wasn’t filming, this was caught on a security camera.”

Permalink
Tim Busch on May 14, 2014 at 18:14:11
“Are you as stupid in real life as you are online?”

Permalink
Bernice Changed on May 14, 2014 at 18:08:24
“It’s called security cams
Seriously did you think there were a few people recording this?
That is how security cams look…
That dog needs to be put down”

Permalink
Oppositas Dictiones on May 14, 2014 at 17:02:34
“His father was very talented filming from all those angles at once.”

Permalink
Joanna Miller on May 14, 2014 at 16:33:22
“Duurrrrrrrrr. Come on people.”

Permalink
huhwut on May 14, 2014 at 15:34:49
“wow!! How many posts like this are we going to see here. IT’S FOOTAGE FROM A HOME SECURITY SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE CAMERAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No one was even behind a camera in the first place.”

Advertisements

Obamanite; The Definition of

March 26, 2011

Obamanite, Obama, Hitler, No we cannot, Yes we can These points define a person that can be addressed by the description of an “Obamanite”.

Updated 5/07/12

Not all points need to be observed in a person to be described as an Obamanite, although at least 50% should be present.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to TwitterAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Yahoo BuzzAdd to Newsvine

It is also noteworthy that just because a person voted for Obama in 2008, this does NOT necessarily make this person an Obamanite.

A reader might ask my reason for even writing this post? A fair question, so in a nutshell I have worked in a field of business (Aquarium Supplies & Resources) for over 3 decades that is probably one of the most liberal fields one can work in and while being liberal does not make one an Obamanite (I know many liberals who are most definitely NOT Obamanites!), I do get so many lazy and nasty emails, phone calls, etc from persons that then get upset just because I attempt to help them help themselves (they want their aquarium information spoon fed and refuse to read many of the articles I send them to back up what I tell them in an answer to a question) or get upset when I call the out on their false accusations or anecdotal information; I felt such a post here was necessary to clear the air from my perspective.

  1. If you are offended by this post/article, you likely are an Obamanite (even if you fit less than 50% of this points)
  2. Truth has no meaning, Lying is a means to an end
  3. A person who cannot see truth and is believes they are in the right even when the facts are presented otherwise
  4. Often condescending to others, yet rarely can see this themselves and think that they are the nicest most reasonable person you would ever meet
  5. Narcissistic Behavior (similar to above point), where these person act and may even think the world revolves themselves, all the while showing no respect for others and their talents and knowledge.
    These persons are the type that will post on Facebook all about themselves yet NEVER take the time to look at others activity, even family and even when receiving “likes”. In my particular case, my online business depends upon a Google algorithm that includes Facebook popularity, however even though I have spent the time looking at others endeavors, I can find weeks where I track only 1 click from Facebook (versus 1000s elsewhere as a comparison). Sadly even my nieces act this way, but this is in part based also on other condescending Obamanite world views IMO
  6. Narcissist who thinks they are “all that”, their poop does not stink, and that they most important person.
    Obamite, Obamanite, Narcissist
    Often simple “Body Language” will ‘tell much’ as to this very common symptom of an Obamite as displayed with this sickening and disgusting picture of President Obama.

    See this excellent article:
    Analysis of Obama’s Psychological Make-Up

  7. Makes up falsehoods about others, often believing their own lies.
    Often text book Sociopath behavior typical of what may seem on the surface as likeable, ordinary persons, but in reality only have intentions to make themselves look good, OR WORSE!
    I have met a few of these persons in my life, with one causing great harm to my family, the other more person destruction that still hurt me and others around me.
    As is obvious Barack Obama also shows these traits, but he is not only destroying one family, but a nation.
  8. Accuses others of not providing help for themselves (or others), when never looking into the facts that scream otherwise
  9. Believes others are placed on this planet to help them, at any time, hour, etc.
  10. Refuses to read anything for themselves, believing others should provide all the information they desire
  11. Believe rules are for others to follow, as they are above rules or policies (I see this constantly in business with persons who leave phone messages that make running my business unprofitable because they are above the rules/policies).
  12. Others are not entitled to make a living from their hard work (this is one I observe constantly where persons treat my time as worthless and then get upset when I attempt to get them to help me help them, all after putting in 14 hour days)
  13. When they fail at something, it must be someone else’s or somethings fault.
    Again I see this when a product I have tested, which few if any other in my business ever perform for customers prior to shipping; then will state that I am screwing them or sending defective products when in reality it is their application, installation, or product that they have placed the new product in that is not functioning (this is especially common with UV Replacement Bulbs and a recent sale of T2 Lights where the person made false accusations and when the lights were returned they were fully functional [sadly 95% of returns, since I pre-test, end up not being defective!]).

    Often such a person will look their inability to make something work or inability to perform a task and despite overwhelming statistics of others succeeding with this same task will still blame others, the product, or the task itself.
    This person I referred to with the T2 lights is an example as even after returning the fully functional & tested lights for a second time claims the lights cannot/will not work. A reasonable non-Obamanite person would realize that maybe they simply are doing something wrong in installation.
    This analogy applies to all aspects of life an politics and is sadly how many persons think; just listen to all the clueless persons in the early stages American Idol who get mad at the judges when told that they simply cannot sing (I for one cannot either, as well cannot perform other tasks such as hanging dry wall correctly, but I do not blame others correcting me or the dry wall as being defective!!!)

  14. Believe Government is the answer to many if not most problems (the government is not your “Daddy”)
  15. Refuses to read or believe anything for themselves, even when the truth or references are right in front of their face!
  16. Rarely can apologize
  17. Will Personally Attack those they disagree with when confronted with known facts.
    I do NOT mean this specifically in the arena of politics either.

    As an example, I have read the forum “Reef Central” many times where nearly everyone will pile on in criticising well written articles about the use of LED Fixtures often using the “straw man” complaint that the articles are biased toward a specific brand (in particular TMC AquaRay LEDs).
    So What?? If I or others have done their research including my personal use and consulting with my professional “sister” aquarium maintenance companies whose use of many different LED fixtures have found one brand to shine well above others, why should I or these other authors not be biased??
    These are ridiculous Obamanite responses. What would be dishonest would be for me or these other authors know the facts about a TMC LED Aquarium Fixture yet recommend others LEDs just so as to appear unbiased.

    The facts are these types “biased accusations” are a popular Obamanite “Straw Man” argument thrown about in many aspects of life.

  18. Google by definition is an Obamanite company with many Obamanite minions.
    So while this is not actually a definition to apply, this is more an example OF an Obamanite and based on my dealings with dishonest Google staff, chances are if you work for Google; you ARE an Obamanite!