In a post/article in the Huffington Post Newsrag, the story of how a cat saves a little boy from an overly aggressive dog was run.
HOWEVER this is not the reason for this blog post here, rather it is the complete Idiocracy and Judgmentalism on display by so many typical Huffington post commenters whereby they condemned the father for shooting the video while watching the dog attack his child as well as condemning the mother for what they thought was her leaving the child behind when in fact neither is true.
Any simple minded person can see that these were surveillance videos spliced together, otherwise how could the dad be at two places at once???
As well the mom was simply making sure the dog had left (as did the cat), NOT running away leaving her child.
YET, several members of Huffington Post could not figure this out!
I checked several HP members other comment history and found that those who had made these ridiculous accusations had a history of vile comments against Christians, Republicans, along with drinking the Global Warming Kool Aid and many other liberal issues.
Here is the video:
Here is the thread:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/05/14/cat-saves-boy-dog_n_5323973.html
Here is the member ID of one example and their comment:
Member; scaroth172
View Comments: Sort:
next
1 – 25
Commented May 14, 2014 at 15:24:24
“Why didn’t the father put down the camera and save the child. Ridiculous. I feel very sorry for this child.”
Here are comments from others who at least had the intelligence to view the video and actually see what happened instead of scaroth172 who essentially viewed a circle but called it a square.
Who we should feel sorry for is her and all of us who have to deal with the results of her voting
Permalink
Steve Rockett on May 17, 2014 at 12:27:45
“No one is this stupid. It was a video surveillance camera.”
Permalink
jwsbmwm3 on May 15, 2014 at 23:10:40
“You are pretty stupid”
Permalink
lenacat on May 15, 2014 at 21:14:58
“Again, pay attention. This was a security video. It was not a person using a camera. Learn to listen/read. You’ll find it quite helpful.”
Permalink
mcblogger on May 15, 2014 at 18:45:29
“There was no father behind the camera. This was taken with a home security system, i.e. cameras that run automatically all the time.”
Permalink
suzy the sewer on May 15, 2014 at 18:32:04
“It was security camera. Dad wasn’t there.”
Permalink
the transporter on May 15, 2014 at 17:46:51
“Most people today have home surveillance system around their home .”
Permalink
Ditchmonkey on May 15, 2014 at 17:01:16
“lol come on now…..”
Permalink
Firstnten on May 15, 2014 at 13:58:09
“It was a security camera mounted on the home. The father wasn’t there. No one was looking through the camera during the attack. The mother ran out when she heard her son scream.”
Permalink
Watching rock grow on May 15, 2014 at 13:40:11
“Dad couldn’t put the camera down because it and him were nailed to the roof!”
Permalink
ivlichelle on May 15, 2014 at 11:11:18
“I feel very sorry for you. It must be hard to go through life with such a low IQ.”
Permalink
Wuud52 on May 15, 2014 at 10:27:17
“Yes, these are stuck in place security cameras. Does not mean it is not staged, but the cameras are fixed like normal security cameras.”
Permalink
John Carne on May 15, 2014 at 09:04:48
“Wouldn’t it be nice if people READ the article and then commented? We can only dream of that utopia.”
Permalink
pbr56 on May 15, 2014 at 08:57:29
“How was the father holding multiple cameras. This was spliced together from at least 2 locations.”
Share it
Permalink
mikehawk5161 on May 15, 2014 at 08:47:26
“Please tell me you wont procreate.”
Permalink
IcedTee63 on May 15, 2014 at 04:17:41
“Sandy you really think a Father watched his child get mauled by a dog? It’s a Security Camera! Jeez People!”
Permalink
bmorganRN on May 15, 2014 at 02:36:07
“And I feel sorry for people with no brains.”
Permalink
eapelu on May 15, 2014 at 00:42:17
“It’s obviously a security surveillance camera shot from different angles.”
Permalink
fleursuzie on May 14, 2014 at 22:40:49
“um….did you think out your comment before you posted it?
The father is NOT filming the child, that is a security camera (actually several).
You see, security cameras are mounted to the house and are constantly recording (ie, he didn’t have to “turn it on”, it is automatic), so you see…no one is actually holding a camera while the child is being attacked.”
Permalink
TySegurado on May 14, 2014 at 19:41:33
“Because he was not holding a camera darling. There was 2 cameras as u can see when the point of view changes! That’s called CCTV System! U go to Walmart, ask for them, buy it, install in your house and suddenly as if by magic u can see what’s going on outside!”
Permalink
Misty DeRousseau on May 14, 2014 at 19:00:12
“There was no one behind a camera, it was caught on surveillance cameras and he spliced them together to show the whole incident and how it went down,”
Permalink
petrified on May 14, 2014 at 18:56:19
“Because the father wasn’t filming, this was caught on a security camera.”
Permalink
Tim Busch on May 14, 2014 at 18:14:11
“Are you as stupid in real life as you are online?”
Permalink
Bernice Changed on May 14, 2014 at 18:08:24
“It’s called security cams
Seriously did you think there were a few people recording this?
That is how security cams look…
That dog needs to be put down”
Permalink
Oppositas Dictiones on May 14, 2014 at 17:02:34
“His father was very talented filming from all those angles at once.”
Permalink
Joanna Miller on May 14, 2014 at 16:33:22
“Duurrrrrrrrr. Come on people.”
Permalink
huhwut on May 14, 2014 at 15:34:49
“wow!! How many posts like this are we going to see here. IT’S FOOTAGE FROM A HOME SECURITY SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE CAMERAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! No one was even behind a camera in the first place.”
C Strohmeyer's Weblog; Life, Business 