Occupy Movement; Comparison to Tea Party

January 6, 2012

Occupy Movement, CockroachThe Democrats have said that the Occupy Party was their answer to and “just like” the Tea Party. The data below conclusively indicate otherwise. Amazingly, this listing only covers reported actions and events.
One is supported by the President of the United States and Democrats in Congress, AND WORSE SUPPORTERS OF EVIL SUCH AS IRAN, NORTH KOREA, AND THE NAZI PARTY; Who will you vote for or support?

Regardless of some of the few good points the Occupy Movement may have, just who supports this group of “takers” and their actions speaks volumes, one just needs to read some history to see that even the Nazi Party in Germany had some “points” such as bringing up the economy of Germany while the rest of the world languished in the depression as well the creation of Volkswagen, a first in this being a car for the masses unlike the Mercedes; but do these few exceptions make right?

Reported as of Nov. 2011 Occupy Party Tea Party
ARRESTS 4149+ 0
DEATHS 7 0
RAPES 12 0
ARSON DAMAGE $10,000,000.00 $0
PUBLIC DEFECATION YES NO
ANTI SEMITIC RANTS 12+ 0
COST TO TAXPAYERS $19,327,487.00+ $0
PUBLIC MASTURBATION 3 0
MOLOTOV COCKTAILS THROWN 10 0
FIGHTS STARTED YES NO (despite Media Attempts)
CHILDREN EXPLOITED YES NO
POLICE CARS DAMAGED YES NO
PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS YES NO
CONCEALED WEAPON ARREST YES NO
THEFTS YES NO
BURGLARIES YES NO
VANDALISM ARREST YES NO
TRESPASSING ARREST YES NO
NON FATAL SHOOTINGS YES NO
PUBLIC URINATION YES NO
URINATION ON OTHERS YES NO
ISRAELI FLAGS BURNED 2 0
AMERICAN FLAGS BURNED 1 0
AMERICAN FLAGS DANCED ON 1 0
AMERICAN FLAGS DESECRATION 25 0
FELONY ASSAULT ON AN EMT 1 0
MURDER 1 0
SUICIDE 1 0
SHOTS FIRED AT WHITE HOUSE 1 0
OBAMA ENDORSED YES NO
SLEAZE QUEEN PELOSI ENDORSED YES NO
COMMUNIST PARTY ENDORSED YES NO
NAZI PARTY ENDORSED YES NO
MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD ENDORSED YES NO
HUGO CHAVEZ ENDORSED YES NO
BLACK PANTHERS ENDORSED YES NO
HEZBOLLAH ENDORSED YES NO
9/11 TRUTHER ENDORSED YES NO
IRAN GOVERNMENT ENDORSED YES NO
NORTH KOREA ENDORSED YES NO
FARRAKHAN ENDORSED YES NO
NATION OF ISLAM ENDORSED YES NO

Occupy Movement, CockroachOccupy Movement, the Parasite Party backed by Supporters of Hate and Evil

 
 

See Also: Occupy Movement Hypocrisy

 

A Couple Friends of this Website:
*UV Bulbs
*LED Aquarium Light Information

Advertisements

Ron Paul decries Killing of Anwar al-Awlaki

October 1, 2011

Ron Paul, Al-AwlakiJust when I was starting to gain some respect for Ron Paul he comes out to defend the rights of US born Anwar al-Awlaki, a traitor who has openly sided with the enemies of the USA and thus declared war on the USA (see this video for openly calling for killing of American civilians and soldiers: CBS News; Al-Awlaki: “Kill Americans”)

I have always had a problem with Ron Paul’s inability to denounce the despicable and immoral “truther” movement within his groupies (see: “Debunking the 9/11 Myths: Special Report), but this latest episode seals the deal for me that if this man somehow becomes the Republican nominee for president.
If nominated, I will either vote third party or hold my nose for Barrack Obama, who thankfully actually did the “right thing” in vetting and signing off on taking out this terrorist. Do not get me wrong, I find Obama’s socialist over-reaching government and plain dishonesty despicable, but then I find Ron Paul’s “look the other way, its not my problem” libertarian view equally troubling and both views have had catastrophic affects on my family on a personal level.

Back to the so-called rights of Anwar al-Awlaki since he is a US born citizen (I say he gave up his citizenship), I would refer to:
Article Three of the United States Constitution; Section 3, Treason.
While I am certainly no constitutional scholar (I will leave this to Mark Levin), my reading seems to indicate that Anwar al-Awlaki essentially denounced his citizenship.
One analogy I would put forth to Ron Paul and others that see this as a first step in a slippery slope of the US government denying certain constitutional rights such as a fair trial is this:
During the Civil War, should we have Mirandized every Confederate Soldier prior to firing on them? (BTW, I know the term to give Miranda Rights occurred well after the Civil War, about 1967 if my memory serves me).
This analogy is far from perfect, for one I think Anwar al-Awlaki is bluntly an evil bastard nearly on par with the likes of Hitler and Pol-Pot, while Confederate Soldiers were anything but evil, even if I might disagree with their cause (even then it is slavery I disagree with, not States Rights, but the right to be free and not owned by anyone transcends ANY States rights).

Anyway, this is my 2 cents as to two issues as to why I think Ron Paul is the least qualified person running for president of the USA, even though he certainly has it right that we need to stop spending immediately.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Here are a few unrelated, but interesting articles by a friend in my main line of works; Aquarium/Pond Keeping:
*UV Bulb; an excellent UV-C Bulb Replacement Guide along with articles

*Aquarium LED Lights, Lighting; a top notch article about choosing the best in LED light fixtures for your aquarium